Hong Kong to Allow Fuel Surcharges Again – Book Your Reward Flights ASAP

Some links to products and partners on this website will earn an affiliate commission.

Hong Kong has been a travel hacker’s paradise for a few years now. Besides the fact that the Asian city is a great place to spend a few days, the authorities had – in our opinion – wisely banned fuel surcharges. Even though they rarely impact the “all-in” cost of regular paid tickets for people booking directly from the airline, they distort other elements of the travel industry, ranging from travel agency commissions to corporate discount deals. And, of course, certain airlines – I’m looking at you British Airways and Lufthansa – have decided to charge fuel surcharges on award tickets, simply because they can and very few government authorities have decided to stop them. Hong Kong was one… which made it one of the cities that an astute travel hacker will try to visit. It appears that this will shortly be changing, however. ūüôĀ

Here’s the press release from Hong Kong’s Civil Aviation Department, as reported by Loyalty Lobby.

CAD announces new display requirements for ticket prices at airlines’ direct sales outlets and arrangements for fuel surcharges

The Civil Aviation Department (CAD) today (September 21) announced a new set of price display requirements for the sale of airlines‚Äô air tickets at their direct sales outlets¬†to enhance transparency and enable consumers to make informed choices.¬†Under the new display requirements, airlines will need to provide the final price of air tickets at all times and provide a breakdown of the final price to show all ‚Äúmust pay‚ÄĚ elements of the ticket fare in each quotation/transaction at their direct sales outlets.¬†If an airline wishes to levy a passenger fuel surcharge (PFS) as part of the final price, it will be required to clearly show the level levied by the airline as with other ‚Äúmust pay‚ÄĚ elements. The above arrangements will take effect from November 1.

The CAD announced in January 2016 that airlines would no longer be approved to levy a PFS from February 1, 2016 onwards for flights originating from Hong Kong until further notice. The CAD then commissioned a consultancy study on international trends and practices on regulation of fuel surcharges and to recommend how fuel surcharges should be regulated. The initial findings, released in 2017, concluded that there was a global trend of liberalisation of fuel surcharges to enhance competition and recommended that the CAD take a similar approach for fuel surcharge regulation. A further review was conducted by the CAD recently on the way forward for fuel surcharge regulation in the long run.

‚ÄúThe further review noted that the global trend of deregulating fuel surcharge to enhance competition, as highlighted in the consultancy study, echoed with the progressive liberalisation policy in Hong Kong‚Äôs air services regime.¬†It also noted that the fuel cost was part of the operating costs of airlines that had to be recouped in any case, be it as part of the basic ticket fare or as a separately listed surcharge.¬†Individual airlines should be allowed to make their own commercial decisions on whether to levy a fuel surcharge. The key is to encourage competition and to ensure transparency in price display to facilitate consumers in making informed choices,‚ÄĚ a spokesman for the CAD said.

‚ÄúWith over 120 airlines serving over 220 destinations at Hong Kong International Airport, Hong Kong has a very competitive airline business.¬†Different kinds of flight services, ranging from premium to budget airlines, enable market forces to keep air ticket prices competitive.¬†The advance of technology, including the availability of price-comparing websites, also enhances consumers‚Äô ability to assess the prices offered by different airlines and in turn enhances competition,‚ÄĚ the spokesman added.

With a view to further encouraging competition amongst airlines while at the same time stepping up efforts to help consumers make more informed choices, the CAD will impose a new set of price display requirements for airlines’ air ticket sales at their direct sales outlets. Under the new requirements, all airlines are required to meet the requirements in the display of ticket prices at their direct sales outlets for flights originating from Hong Kong, as follows:

  1. clear display of total ‚Äúmust pay‚ÄĚ price (i.e. the price which a passenger must pay for the purpose of boarding a flight). Elements of the ‚Äúmust pay‚ÄĚ price include the applicable airfare, PFS (if levied by the relevant airline), Air Passenger Departure Tax, Passenger Security Charge and Airport Construction Fee.¬†The information must be displayed at all times throughout the booking process in each quotation/transaction;
  2. provision of a breakdown of all the elements (including any PFS which may be levied by the individual airline) of the all-inclusive ‚Äúmust pay‚ÄĚ price; and
  3. if there are optional price supplements (e.g. extra baggage allowance, travel insurance, etc) in addition to the ‚Äúmust pay‚ÄĚ ticket fare, each of them must be offered on an opt-in basis (i.e. consumers will determine whether to purchase these supplements by making a positive selection, e.g. ticking the respective boxes on the relevant page of airlines‚Äô booking website, etc).

Airlines which comply with the above display requirements may separately list the PFS in the price breakdown, with effect from November 1. That is, all tickets issued on or after November 1 for flights that originate from Hong Kong may include a PFS as determined by individual airlines. For tickets issued before November 1 but for travel after this date, no PFS is payable unless the ticket is reissued due to passenger’s circumstances. Airlines that do not levy PFS are also required to comply with the price display requirements for transparency.

‚ÄúAs at today, the majority of airlines providing passenger services in Hong Kong are already in compliance with the new display requirements.¬†The remaining airlines that are currently enhancing their booking systems to meet the price display requirements are allowed a grace period of six months.¬†Consumers are encouraged to look out for the final price, which includes all ‚Äúmust pay‚ÄĚ elements of the tickets during price comparison, and contact airlines for clarification in case of doubt.¬†We will closely monitor the implementation of the new display requirements,‚ÄĚ the spokesman said.

The CAD has consulted stakeholders on this new requirement and received general support for the liberalisation of fuel surcharges and price display requirements. The airlines and the Travel Industry Council have agreed on the implementation arrangements of the price display requirements. The Consumer Council and the Competition Commission also support the liberalisation and the enhanced transparency requirements. The Competition Commission sees the liberalisation and transparency as a step forward in ensuring that airlines compete on a level playing field.

With regard to the current time-limited resumption of cargo fuel surcharge (CFS), it will remain in effect until end-2019. From January 1, 2020 individual airlines may, based on their commercial considerations, set CFS at a level based on their own circumstances or choose not to include such a surcharge.

In other words, as long as they don’t promote and publicise ¬£1 fares, with obligatory “taxes and surcharges” to be added later, airlines will now be free to allocate fare components as they wish.

These new rules will come into effect on 1 November, 2018. You should expect that British Airways, Virgin Atlantic, etc. will jump on the opportunity to charge YQ on reward tickets ex-Hong Kong as soon as they can. I am less certain about whether Cathay Pacific will join in, at least not at the outrageous levels of BA and Lufthansa (and to a lesser extent Virgin Atlantic). But of course Cathay were likely to have been intimately involved in the CAD’s study of the matter.

Which means that you’d better start booking any reward flights from Asia that you might have been thinking about!

Trackbacks & Pingbacks


  1. Alex W says

    I noticed a one way from BKK to LHR “only” has charges of ¬£186 in business class. This is not too bad compared to e.g. New York which is only half the flight time yet somehow has fees of ¬£402 one-way. Surely the HKG route will not charge such ridiculous levels. Hopefully Brazil won’t follow suit.

    How can they badge this as “competition” when they are just saying yes you can charge the same as what the other airlines charge. Isn’t that price fixing?

  2. VK says


    If expert flyer is not showing seats as blocked, but SQ Tel team and online seat selection is showing these as blocked (bulk heads 11, 91 or 96) on new a380 SIN to SYD Feb 2019. How do I set an alert on expert flyer? Cause expert flyer thinks the seats are available.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *